Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:00:33 +0000
From:      "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To:        Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
Cc:        qingli@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r198306 - head/sys/net
Message-ID:  <d873d5be0910201900w67833e83kf53b556e2b5c8d00@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bc2d970910201734o332582ceic30fb7e42e14c812@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <d873d5be0910201621h768e126dq34df38c07b83fe47@mail.gmail.com> <bc2d970910201734o332582ceic30fb7e42e14c812@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/21/09, Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> wrote:
> On non-SMP kernels there's only one CPU, so there's no point in
> binding a thread to a CPU.
>

If that is all that is intended here, then it does not seem that it
should be done at all on non-SMP, but rather that it should be made
conditional on #ifdef SMP.

b.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d873d5be0910201900w67833e83kf53b556e2b5c8d00>