Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 23:30:38 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu, jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@polstra.com, rob@ideal.net.au Subject: Re: IPDIVERT broken? Message-ID: <199705211330.XAA26062@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * It seems that if we are to survive as a project in the long-term, > * developers are going to have to take greater responsibility for their > * actions and be willing to follow *all* the way through on any changes > * made, repairing the results of any interface changes and essentially > * just being willing to make things work again on a tree-wide basis if > * they break. > >I think this sentence is too long, but I agree 100%. I agree with this out of context quote. Developers should repair the results of any interface changes to their code. Changers shouldn't be expected to do it all. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705211330.XAA26062>