Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:35:48 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: past@netmode.ntua.gr Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: JCK License implications (was: State of Server-Side Java) Message-ID: <200008211535.JAA12276@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20000821165843.A20089@netmode.ece.ntua.gr> References: <20000821165843.A20089@netmode.ece.ntua.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If I understand things correctly, people with no access to the JCK can still > send patches against patchset 10, and they will be incorporated by the > porting team in the main tree. You got it. > So for everyone else, but the porting team members (both of them :-)), > the native port still IS patchset 10. This way things like native > threads, etc., can still be community-developed and tested. On the money. > The only thing missing will be the patches that the porting team members > make, that provide JCK compliance. That's not too bad IMHO. Except, these *will* be made available 'after the fact', in 'patchset 11' or somesuch, similar to what's being done now for patchset 1-10. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008211535.JAA12276>