Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:33:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> To: chris@calldei.com Cc: billf@chc-chimes.com (Bill Fumerola), green@FreeBSD.org (Brian Fundakowski Feldman), des@FreeBSD.org (Dag-Erling Smorgrav), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c Message-ID: <200003260933.LAA61208@freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <20000326010748.E18325@holly.calldei.com> from Chris Costello at "Mar 26, 2000 01:07:48 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Chris Costello wrote: > On Sunday, March 26, 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > I really think this should be a part of the Linux emulator if > > > anything. This just seems like we're only encouraging the use of > > > bad interfaces. > > > > I think the point of having this "bad interface" in our tree is to open up the > > doors to software written by linuxcentric and/or unintelligent programmers who > > write nonportable code. > > I don't particularly like non-portable code. hear hear! > > Sometimes we can get around this by porting their code, sometimes we can't > > (read: binary only software). > > See my comment about it being part of the Linux compatibility > code. More hear hear, how did this enter the tree anyway ?? this clearly belongs as part of the linuxulator, it has _nothing_ to do in a generic FreeBSD system... I dont remember seeing a discussion on this topic anywhere ?? -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003260933.LAA61208>