Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:14:42 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rework how we store process times in the kernel and deferring calcru() Message-ID: <200410011114.42446.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200410011102.43394.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <200410011102.43394.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 01 October 2004 11:02 am, John Baldwin wrote: > I'll commit this soonish unless there are any objections. The basic idea > is to store process times resource usage as raw data (i.e. as bintimes and > tick counts) for both process usage and child usage and only calculate the > timeval style times if they are explicitly asked for. This lets us avoid > always calling calcru() to calculate the timeval values in exit1() for > example. A more detailed listing of the changes follows: Sorry for the dupe. kmail crashed and I wasn't sure the first one had made it, esp. given that it came back up with a partial version of this e-mail (hence the two different endings). -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410011114.42446.jhb>