Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:06:21 -0600 From: Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com> To: Ezat - Ezatech <ezat@ezatech.com.au>, Bogdan =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C4=86ulibrk?= <bc@default.co.yu> Cc: tundra@tundraware.com, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: So How Hard Is Moving From 6.3 To 7.0? Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.2.20080302125549.02522b58@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <47CA8EC3.2090004@ezatech.com.au> References: <47A3C37B.10707@tundraware.com> <47CA89CE.7070503@default.co.yu> <47CA8EC3.2090004@ezatech.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 05:25 AM 3/2/2008, Ezat - Ezatech wrote:
> Would tend to agree.
> I just lost a machines hdd so it's a good opportunity to build with
> latest release but otherwise, i have still have a 6.0 box running
> strong and executing tasks which it was built for.=C2 No plans to
> upgrade.
> ezat
> Bogdan =C4=86ulibrk wrote:
>
> ---=3D --BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> | I have a stable 6.3 production server.
> I would stop right there. Question is why would you change
> something
> that simply works?
> - --
> Best regards,
> Bogdan Culibrk
Why upgrade? In my case it was that performance would be so much better=20
under 7 than under 6.X. It is inevitable that systems need to be upgraded=
=20
as versions become EOL (end of life and no longer supported) or=20
replaced. In my case I run FreeBSD on servers which have a much longer=20
life than client desktops or laptops.
For those that have been doing FreeBSD a while, as I have since 1.X. Each=
=20
upgrade has its problems. It just takes some patience and ingenuity to=20
work around them. These mailing lists with the large community help a=20
great deal.
-Derek
--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.0.22.2.20080302125549.02522b58>