Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 Nov 1998 23:43:39 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        John Capo <jc@irbs.com>
Cc:        freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Dog Sloooow SMP 
Message-ID:  <199811050743.XAA00636@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Nov 1998 14:20:58 EST." <19981104142058.31411@irbs.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Turns out that SMP broke for me on 5/21/98 in identcpu.c version
> 1.47 when code was added to identify PIIs. Not setting cpu = CPU_II
> fixes the problem.
> 
> I suspect the real breakage is in pmap.c where cpu is used.

If you change all of the 'cpu == CPU_686' tests to include CPU_PII, do 
you get your performance back?  It looks like at the very least it will 
be costing you some performance optimisations.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811050743.XAA00636>