Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 09:48:12 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about Motif packages Message-ID: <199604110748.JAA03978@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199604102204.PAA19312@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> from "Satoshi Asami" at Apr 10, 96 03:04:34 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Satoshi Asami wrote:
> * imake -DUseInstalledMotif -DUseInstalled \
> * -I${MOTIFBASE}/lib/X11/config
> *
> * instead?
>
> Hmm, we use "xmkmf -a", which does a whole lot more than just a single
> imake. I don't think we want to get into that.
``a whole lot more'' is a bit of an overstatement. :-) All it does is
a ``make Makefiles; make includes; make depend'' after running imake.
> As I said in my mail explaining the bsd.port.mk changes, libraries are
> not hard to handle at all, so I'm not worried, xmkmf with explicit
> Motif references should work fine.
At least one Motif kit i've got (actually a really old one) doesn't
come with a separate script. The README only hinted about the above
(using -DUseInstalledMotif).
--
cheers, J"org
joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604110748.JAA03978>