Date: 11 May 2001 11:15:31 +0100 From: Wayne Pascoe <wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk> To: Rasputin <rara.rasputin@virgin.net> Cc: , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: TCP/IP Subnetting Message-ID: <86k83oi43g.fsf@pan.realtime.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010511100128.D21357@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <86r8xxnncd.fsf@pan.penguinpowered.org.uk> <20010511100128.D21357@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rasputin <rara.rasputin@virgin.net> writes: > Can't be done. Yeah, learned this last night :) Bah! :) > You can only split networks in half, so you can have: > > 128 addresses (126 usable) > 64 (62 usable) > 32 (30 usable) > 16 (14 usable) > 8 (6 usable) > 8 (6 usable) <---- put your 4 here > > But now you're looking at 6 subnets, which isn't what you want. > > Don't know of a way round this , and you're looking at connecting all those > separate subnets with a lot of networking kit. I'm looking into it now. Possibly subnetting into batches of 32, routing one of those via eth0/1 and routing the other 3 via eth0/0 Go from there and see what happens :) -- - Wayne Pascoe E-mail: wayne.pascoe@realtime.co.uk Phone : +44 (0) 20 7544 4668 Mobile: +44 (0) 788 431 1675 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k83oi43g.fsf>