Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:12:45 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? Message-ID: <4182B24D.90203@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200410292046.34494.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> <200410292002.52978.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <6.1.2.0.0.20041029141407.06fc82d8@64.7.153.2> <200410292046.34494.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Nottebrock wrote: >On Friday, 29. October 2004 20:29, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >>I think EHCI would only make it worse. >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>The same 1.1 bugs would be there >>that you mention, and then the ones added by EHCI. i.e. it doesnt take any >>1.1 bugs away, just adds more. >> >> > >Exactly. And I still say it should go in. And you should file a PR about your >ehci issues (oh, yeah, and we need USB maintainers to take them, too :(). > I have been taking a sebatical from freeBSD after puting my marriage a bit too close to the line than I like.. :-) but one of my next things to look at is teh USB code.. I've already been in there a bit and will be getting in again with a few others who have shown interest as soon as: 1/ I've spent enough time at home with the kids/wife to keep that side balanced.. 2/ work settles down 3/ the 5.3 push is over. We have about 6 people who have shown interest in USB and we should be starting up a mailing list soon (who's doing that?) which should help. In addition we need expertise in newbus, CAM/SIM to help us get those sides of things in order. It needs more than a small touchup.. > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4182B24D.90203>