Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Dec 2007 11:44:47 -0600
From:      Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: (Very) bogus package dependencies
Message-ID:  <D17C94E2D605123529B0A39E@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local>
In-Reply-To: <476FC0D3.2090106@icyb.net.ua>
References:  <476FC0D3.2090106@icyb.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On December 24, 2007 4:23:15 PM +0200 Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> 
wrote:
>
> And a practical thought: it seems that in recent FreeBSD versions system
> tar can work rather well with the ISO CD9660 FS, so it should be enough
> to list directories in an image. What I am trying to say: before adding
> a dependency examine your options and choose the best one.

In principle that is good practice, but how many port maintainers are 
knowledgeable enough of programming to make those choices?  I suspect 
quite a few are but not all.  I'm certainly not.  Perhaps this is an issue 
that the committers would be more suited to address?  (I get the 
impression that most, if not all, of them are programmers or at least very 
knowledgeable of programming.)

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D17C94E2D605123529B0A39E>