Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Oct 2005 21:13:17 +0400
From:      "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com>
To:        Bill Schoolcraft <bill@wiliweld.com>
Cc:        Warren <shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Flash PLugin for FireFox
Message-ID:  <cb5206420510011013g6c346c16uf8d63ed6617ffa4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051001091038.A20839@liam.billschoolcraft.com>
References:  <200510012029.12074.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <cb5206420510010417t3296da03r16259bc4fa8d2965@mail.gmail.com> <20051001091038.A20839@liam.billschoolcraft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/1/05, Bill Schoolcraft <bill@wiliweld.com> wrote:
> At Sat, 1 Oct 2005 it looks like Andrew P. composed:
>
> > On 10/1/05, Warren <shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> wrote:
> >> Whats a good stable flash plugin for FireFox for FreeBSD?  various one=
s i have
> >> tried in the past have made the browser to unstable to use.
> >> --
> >> Yours Sincerely
> >> Shinjii
> >> http://www.shinji.nq.nu
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebs=
d.org"
> >>
> >
> > www/linuxpluginwrapper-20050910
> > +
> > www/linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3
>
> Hmm, any idea when this will be available for 'amd64' ?
>
> #############################
>
> [root@liam /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper]-> make install
> =3D=3D=3D>  linuxpluginwrapper-20050613 is only for i386, and you are run=
ning amd64.
>
> #############################
>
> [root@liam /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin]-> make install
> =3D=3D=3D>  linux-flashplugin-5.0r51_3 is only for i386, and you are runn=
ing amd64.
>
> #############################
>
> TIA
>
> --
> Bill Schoolcraft
> PO Box 210076
> San Francisco, CA 94121
> http://billschoolcraft.com
>               ~
> "You do best what you like most."
>
>

Many things are still missing for FreeBSD/amd64 to
be a desktop OS. I'm not involved into any development,
but I think that enabling Flash is nowhere near the top
priorities.

<imho>Let Adobe keep it's narrow view of things -
I'll vote with my money for AJAX and against Flash,
Java and other proprietary horseshit.</imho>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420510011013g6c346c16uf8d63ed6617ffa4>