Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:08:01 +0200 From: Espen Skoglund <esk@ira.uka.de> To: dan@langille.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, esk@ira.uka.de Subject: Re: latest INDEX count versus cvs Message-ID: <15537.27649.737562.316238@i30nb20.ira.uka.de> In-Reply-To: <20020406041010.D0C633F28@bast.unixathome.org> References: <20020406041010.D0C633F28@bast.unixathome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Dan Langille] > Hi folks, > [this msg has been cc'd to the maintainers of the ports in question] > A new INDEX was just committed with 6777 ports. > I've just finished a reconciliation between cvs, INDEX, and > FreshPorts. Here are my findings: > The following ports are being pulled out of a cvsup, but are not > appearing in INDEX. Does anyone have a reason why they should not > be added to their respective catetgory Makefiles? > devel/arm-elf-gcc31 Well, gcc 3.1 is not released yet. Someone seems to have made a repo copy of arm-elf-gcc295. All files in both ports are identical (except for the cvsid in Makefile). eSk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15537.27649.737562.316238>