Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:16:55 +0100 (BST) From: <n_hibma@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: hid_report_size() prototype wrong in both -stable and -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104171815120.85224-100000@henny.webweaving.org> In-Reply-To: <200104171412.f3HECs066784@morpheus.kfu.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
usb.h != libusb.h NetBSD has a stupid naming convention. Use libusb.h in FreeBSD. The prototypes are correct as is. The changes to libusb made in CURRENT have not been backported to STABLE (yet). Nick On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Nick Sayer wrote: > > The definition of hid_report_size() differs between -stable and -current (as > to its prototype), yet /usr/src/sys/dev/usb.h shows no difference between > -stable and -current, and is wrong in either case. > > This is causing some heartburn for -current builders of the xmame port. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > -- The USB for FreeBSD project. n_hibma@FreeBSD.ORG http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/usb/usb.pl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0104171815120.85224-100000>