Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 20:55:35 +0200 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r319380 - head/math/libtommath Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=DXCF9rW7HLpsw9km1mnF3bwJyBAA0wNi0Y7rRjPEA1A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwOQzkDvhkfCdK3SbcKFevphev7Jy1U9uR5HF2k=zG%2BH6Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <201305291541.r4TFf1PO037359@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxg=eK-DR=Bb%2BBo-RJCpdqXeZ=6z%2Bmz7cMf1ZXUqSK%2BbacQ@mail.gmail.com> <A27D5524-1580-4685-AFB6-FE0CF631DBF2@freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgnhNxChnHrJ_tLzBuuHZY0fc9y1=AysSaMV4S4JxjsXhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGFTUwOVwYcmt%2BzJZLXe7ZjWo%2BV7JCTgEZ0WSaJu%2BVubYn_sOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgmg-37Oxjh8dOnrqEzHPi2PLpyU33JTUFi9Oo00mMaMbg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGFTUwOQzkDvhkfCdK3SbcKFevphev7Jy1U9uR5HF2k=zG%2BH6Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 May 2013 20:38, b.f. <bf1783@googlemail.com> wrote: >> BROKEN is not used just because a port fails its regression tests but >> it isn't reserved just for build failures. > > Of course it isn't. My point was that even if the test failure > indicated a "failure of the actual program", it doesn't necessarily > mean that the port should be marked BROKEN, as you seemed to suggest. > It depends on the nature of the failure. Ah, I see. I was more concerned that regression test was disabled without looking into the nature of the failure. The commit log was not clear. That said, I think we have the answer from miwi@ already so it is a moot point. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=DXCF9rW7HLpsw9km1mnF3bwJyBAA0wNi0Y7rRjPEA1A>