Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:26:41 -0700 From: flowers <flowers.hidey.hole@shaw.ca> To: Joshua Lokken <joshua@twobirds.us>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Top posting Message-ID: <FGEIJLCPFDNMGDOKNBABGECBCIAA.flowers.hidey.hole@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040319172130.GB2044@cs025_2k>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joshua Lokken > Sent: March 19, 2004 10:22 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Top posting > > Wow, almost every single reply to the list today was top posted. > People, please know (and you must, you have to read them, too) > that posting replies to the top of an email is, well, counter- > intuitive, hard to follow, and goes against the general grain of > RFC 1855. Please, it has been requested from many users of this > list, do not top post replies, but don't stop sending them ;) > > Thanks, folks. My apologies. I saw the requests not to "top post" but didn't understand what that meant. I think my "Outlook 2000" comment explains why. :) -Dan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FGEIJLCPFDNMGDOKNBABGECBCIAA.flowers.hidey.hole>