Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 11:45:14 +0900 From: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: juha@saarinen.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Message-ID: <20020507114514Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0205070731570.776-100000@den2> References: <20020507020339N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <Pine.WNT.4.43.0205070731570.776-100000@den2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
juha> Just out of curiosity, why is version 8.x so desirable, and not juha> 9.x? Why isn't 9.x in the base -STABLE? It's another story and not a scope of my interests. If BIND9 gets enough maturity level for everybody's daily use, it would be a good option for that. But BIND9 is quite different from BIND8 (many existing features are lost by some reasons); I'm afraid that BIND9 for 4-stable breaks POLA. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020507114514Q.matusita>