Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Nov 2020 18:46:40 +0100
From:      Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de>
To:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
Cc:        Peter Czanik <peter.czanik@balabit.com>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 
Message-ID:  <A88D4D7F-89E2-4F39-9CF6-946FEDB27337@lastsummer.de>
In-Reply-To: <202011071725.0A7HP9rm003300@slippy.cwsent.com>
References:  <202011071539.0A7FdMmj052814@slippy.cwsent.com> <6E6B60B0-DE59-4F2B-B612-07F7B505AF58@lastsummer.de> <202011071725.0A7HP9rm003300@slippy.cwsent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On 7. Nov 2020, at 6:25 PM, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> That's not needed. The proposal is to replace the syslog-ng port with =
the=20
> contents of syslog-ng329 and deprecate the others. Those using=20
> sysutils/syslog-ng will see no change. Those using older versions will =
need=20
> to replace syslog-ngNN with simply syslog-ng.

Actually I was referring to this:

=
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/master/sysutils/syslog-ng329=
/files/syslog-ng.conf.sample#L1

Also a question for Peter.


Cheers,
Franco=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A88D4D7F-89E2-4F39-9CF6-946FEDB27337>