Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Apr 1998 15:09:01 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Adam David <adam@veda.is>
To:        phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bin/6364
Message-ID:  <199804221509.PAA25066@veda.is>
In-Reply-To: <3570.893254136@critter.freebsd.dk> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Apr 22, 98 04:08:56 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> No, that is how schg works, isn't it ?   I pressume from the
> rather sparse data in your PR that you had schg set on some
> files on the ufs tree...
> 
> If not please provide some more info...

Sorry about the terse wording. It seems odd to me that cpio doesn't set
schg on the destination file when the source file has it set, or that this
behaviour is not documented and there is no flag to let cpio handle chflags
on the files it is working with. I expect an nfs destination to fail setting
the flags because that is a remote operation, but it surprised me when a ufs
destination did not preserve the flag settings.

Under other circumstances I would have made a fuller analysis and a patch but
my time is tied at the moment.

Adam

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804221509.PAA25066>