Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:20:39 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net> Cc: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tar and nodump flag Message-ID: <20011203132039.A39433@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20011203160558.R68816-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>; from bandix@looksharp.net on Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 04:12:28PM -0500 References: <20011203112625.A28547@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011203160558.R68816-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 04:12:28PM -0500, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > I should think it would be pretty > straightforward seeing as there is already a port which has taken care > of any potential build problems. Why do you think that?? The port builds using gmake and autoconf. Any in-FreeBSD-tree bits build with Bmake and w/o autoconf. Also the port has none of the FreeBSD specific changes. If the ports was in the perfect shape, why do you think the in-tree gnu tar hasn't been upgraded yet? Please look at the diffs in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/tar -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011203132039.A39433>