Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:45:35 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Adam PAPAI <wooh@wooh.hu> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: sysbench / fileio - Linux vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <4C0A7F2F.3030105@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4C09FC43.8070804@wooh.hu> References: <4C09932B.6040808@wooh.hu> <201006050236.17697.bruce@cran.org.uk> <4C09FC43.8070804@wooh.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/5/10 12:26 AM, Adam PAPAI wrote: > On 6/5/10 3:36 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: >> Some quick tests show that ufs does do rather poorly on my system too. I have >> the following filesystems setup: >> >> /var : ufs with softupdates >> /usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled >> /usr/src : zfs with compression enabled >> /home : zfs with compression disabled and checksums enabled >> >> I ran a test with a blocksize of 8KB and 16 threads. >> >> /var : 25.2MB/s >> /usr/obj : 64.8MB/s >> /usr/src : 386.3MB/s >> /home : 60.3MB/s >> > > It seems I have to test it with zfs as well. Tomorrow I'm gonna test it. > > Then the linux people will insist you use btrfs to compare apples to apples ... etc... etc..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0A7F2F.3030105>