Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 20:25:15 +0200 From: Rodrigo Osorio <ros@bebik.net> To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <rm@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How should we name node-js ports ? Message-ID: <682a272e-939b-93aa-44c1-51b7286b07e4@bebik.net> In-Reply-To: <32cbf11f-5ce0-ce16-8c56-c45d585ed2f6@FreeBSD.org> References: <ba4cd1f6-2bd7-f710-2e6c-56c470c5ef7d@bebik.net> <32cbf11f-5ce0-ce16-8c56-c45d585ed2f6@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/15/17 14:57, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Rodrigo Osorio wrote on 05/14/2017 15:16: >> Hi, >> >> I have a bunch of nodejs ports to add, most of them as dependencies, >> and I wonder if we can find a naming standard like adding 'node' or >> 'node-js' prefix in the name ; I personally prefer 'node'. >> >> As a result a port who install the node package xxx will be named >> 'node-xxx' >> >> Does it sounds good to you ? >> >> Thanks for your time, >> >> -- rodrigo > > Am I right they will be actually installed with npm? If so, it would > make sense to name them npm-<package>, like rubygems installed packages. > Hi Ruslan, That sounds good to me, if everyone agrees we can move this way. -- rodrigo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?682a272e-939b-93aa-44c1-51b7286b07e4>