Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:35:40 -0500 (EST)
From:      Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>
To:        Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Ratelimint Enhancement patch (Please Review One Last Time!)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012132134340.25075-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>
In-Reply-To: <20001213193014.J72273@elvis.mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 02:42:53PM -0500, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
> 
> > It could just as easily be a SYN flood against a single port... or a large
> > number of clients trying to connected to your crashed web server... :P Or
> > it could just as easily be an ack flood against a port without a listener
> > and be showing up in the "not the ack flood" counter.
> 
> Exactly. Bikeshedding the millions of possible reasons the queue/ratelimit
> was triggered is silly.
> 
> Bosko, please change the descriptions to something very generic before
> committing them ("ratelimiting TCP RST packets: x/y pps" or something)

	Mike said he would do it and re-post the diff.

> -- 
> Bill Fumerola - security yahoo         / Yahoo! inc.
>               - fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org

  Later,
  Bosko Milekic
  bmilekic@technokratis.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0012132134340.25075-100000>