Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 19:27:35 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@ida.interface-business.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Any GateD experts? Message-ID: <199608201727.TAA00600@ida.interface-business.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, i've got a GateD setup that works rather fine, however when i call out from this machine through a modem using (IIJ-)PPP, i always get these warnings: innocence gated[73]: rt_add: interface not found for 195.213.34.1/255.255.255.255 gw 195.213.34.134 Kernel innocence gated[73]: krt_recv_route: unable to add requested route to 195.213.34.1/255.255.255.255 via 195.213.34.134 innocence gated[73]: krt_recv_route: unable to add requested route to 195.213.34.1/255.255.255.255 via 195.213.34.134 ...and those when shutting the PPP connection down: innocence gated[73]: KRT SENT type DELETE(2)flags HOST(4) error 3: No such process innocence gated[73]: KRT SENT type DELETE(2)flags HOST(4) error 3: No such process innocence gated[73]: KRT SENT dest 195.213.34.1 innocence gated[73]: KRT SENT dest 195.213.34.1 innocence gated[73]: KRT SEND DELETE 195.213.34.1 mask 255.255.255.255 router 195.213.34.134 flags <>0: No such process innocence gated[73]: KRT SEND DELETE 195.213.34.1 mask 255.255.255.255 router 195.213.34.134 flags <>0: No such process Everything is benign, all the other routes continue to work fine, but the complaints are a little annoying. Routing out interface 195.213.34.134 (my side of PPP) to 195.213.34.1 (his side) works since PPP established the route. The machine is connected to the Internet through an ISDN router, and connected to various private IP nets through another ISDN link, GateD collects all the RIP annoucements from the routers and acts as a default gateway for the company network (via ICMP redirect). The above PPP route doesn't need to be available to the entire network (though it would not hurt if it is), and it's a bogus (non-registered) address, but that's beyond my control since it's the self-invented network of a customer, and i basically have to live with this. (To the best of my knowledge, the IP address range has been assigned to RIPE, but is still unallocated. At least, there's no SOA for the reverse IP map. So i figure there should be no conflicts with the Internet (yet).) Does anybody know what's the magic to avoid these warnings? -- J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de http://www.interface-business.de/~j
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608201727.TAA00600>