Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:21:41 +0200 From: "Laurent C." <lrntct@gmail.com> To: "Sam Lawrance" <boris@brooknet.com.au> Cc: sobomax@freebsd.org, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, Hiroki Sato <hrs@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, vd@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports LEGAL MOVED UPDATING ports/www Makefile CVSROOT modules ports/www/linux-flashplugin Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/www/linux-flashplugin6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/www/linux-flashplugin7 Makefile d Message-ID: <787520ee0604100321l2bb1d378o545e74d442c964e1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2006/4/10, Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au>: > > > On 10/04/2006, at 7:03 PM, Vasil Dimov wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:56:03PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote: > >>> > >>> I am using FreeBSD ports tree on Linux. > >> > >> Sounds terribly dodgy. > > > > It does not matter. It's just an 'example' to show that the ports tree > > is not necessary tied with FreeBSD in a means of a underlying OS. > > > > I could be using the ports tree under DOS, Windows, irix and hpux :-o > > I think it does matter. As a project, I don't think it's to our > advantage to gain a reputation for trying to help our users sidestep > software licensing. Hi all, I'm not a lawyer but AFAIK in France (and maybe in other countries), people have the right to do some things that are forbidden by EULA. In this case i= n the interoperability name, maybe people have the right to use Flash player on FreeBSD. Laurent
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?787520ee0604100321l2bb1d378o545e74d442c964e1>