Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 02:04:45 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Archiver packages on FreeBSD CD 1 Message-ID: <m38yl5slw2.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20031219151032.GA52845@comp.chem.msu.su> (Yar Tikhiy's message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:10:33 %2B0300") References: <20031219105400.GA39759@comp.chem.msu.su> <20031219145435.GA31800@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20031219151032.GA52845@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org> writes: > That's why I started this topic--to collect different opinions. > Please note that you didn't state you needed "zoo" or "lzo"; I'm using .tar.gz most often, then .tar.bz2, then .zip and occasionally, I have to unpack .lha or .rar. .arj ... well, a long time ago. .lzx: same. OTOH, lzo is a very fast compression library that's used by some ports that do real-time communications, for instance, openvpn. lzop as gzip replacement that uses lzo is indeed used less often by me. How about scanning the atimes of the ports' files to see what ports are used by how many users absolutely, and relative to the count of installations? -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m38yl5slw2.fsf>