Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:36:22 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com> Cc: Johnson David <davidjohnson@siemens.com>, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, 'cali' <calculus@softhome.net> Subject: Re: Explaining FreeBSD features Message-ID: <86is04lvbd.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200506231348.06197.algould@datawok.com> (Andrew L. Gould's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:48:06 -0500") References: <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E0866@mvwcim1a.acuson.com> <200506231348.06197.algould@datawok.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com> writes: > On Thursday 23 June 2005 12:16 pm, Johnson David wrote: > > If by "works", you mean people leave the community, then you are > > correct. We all know what "F" in "RTFM" means. While we may not say > > it with those words anymore, we still often say it with the same > > abusive attitude. It's far more productive to say "RTM" than "RTFM". > I have, on occasion, used "RTFM", ignoring the "F"; but not thinking > about whether the reader would ignore it as well -- poor form on my > part. I will certainly drop the "F" in the future. Why? Everybody knows the F stands for Fine :) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86is04lvbd.fsf>