Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 00:06:41 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Greg Black <gjb-freebsd@gba.oz.au> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Securelevel 3 ant setting time Message-ID: <6639.935186801@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 07:46:57 %2B1000." <19990820214657.1605.qmail@alice.gba.oz.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990820214657.1605.qmail@alice.gba.oz.au>, Greg Black writes: >> Xntpd is not that difficult. Unlike ntpdate, it can update your system clock >> while also acting as a time server for your local network, reducing bandwidth >> costs (yes, minimal, if you have a very small network, but still worth time and >> money.) It is also more reliable and far more featureful than ntpdate (hey, >> encryption compensation!). > >Just as a bit of extra information, xntpd is useless for small >networks that don't have constant connectivity to time servers. Not any longer with ntpv4... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6639.935186801>