Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 00:34:53 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Sergei Vyshenski <svysh@pn.sinp.msu.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5 now available for x86 Message-ID: <200006270634.AAA32148@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2000 02:34:04 %2B0400." <4.3.2.7.0.20000627022543.00ab0cc0@vivaldi> References: <4.3.2.7.0.20000627022543.00ab0cc0@vivaldi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <4.3.2.7.0.20000627022543.00ab0cc0@vivaldi> Sergei Vyshenski writes: : So FreeBSD has two stable branches? : Which one is more stable among stable for i386? : Say for use at a site that need reliable round-the-clock : gatewaing, named and mail operation? I'd use 4.0-stable. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006270634.AAA32148>