Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:04:31 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Subject:   Re: locking in a device driver
Message-ID:  <43690DBF.3020706@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <43684F8B.3000900@alphaque.com>
References:  <4360B8EE.4070605@alphaque.com>	<4360DD7B.20900@samsco.org>	<4361044B.50807@alphaque.com>	<20051027.205250.55834228.imp@bsdimp.com>	<4361E3E0.4090409@alphaque.com>	<43676121.4030801@alphaque.com>	<436791ED.8010808@samsco.org> <4367AA8D.3060506@alphaque.com>	<4367BBDB.7020005@elischer.org> <4367C07C.1040900@alphaque.com> <4367C726.8070405@samsco.org> <4367E858.6000506@elischer.org> <43684F8B.3000900@alphaque.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dinesh Nair wrote:

>
> On 11/02/05 06:12 Julian Elischer said the following:
>
>> depends on what they are using it for..
>> if it's  a WAN interface, then splimp. (INTR_TYPE_NET)
>>
>> if ppp or several other moduels are loaded, teh tty and net masks are 
>> combined anyhow..
>
>
> it's a quad-span E1/T1 line card which would be carrying voice PRIs. 
> the card interrupts every 1000 times a second.
>
I'd go for NET
with data/voice convergence, it makes sense to me.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43690DBF.3020706>