Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:27:04 -0700 From: "Darren Spruell" <phatbuckett@gmail.com> To: "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Andy Christianson <achristianson@orases.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs CIFS Message-ID: <839aec700803211627r11dbc1c1ic699eb8ddf697e1f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080320204047.X47860@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <776B93361B7BEE4FAD9E720FFBC746B6BDDB64@34093-EVS4C2.exchange.rackspace.com> <20080320204047.X47860@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > isn't SMB and CIFS the same? Superficially, although there are differences in the protocols. CIFS descended from the original SMB specification and adds to it. Hence, why e.g. in Linux you find separate module support for cifs and smbfs. -- Darren Spruell phatbuckett@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?839aec700803211627r11dbc1c1ic699eb8ddf697e1f>