Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 May 2001 16:42:55 -0700
From:      Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.privatelabs.com>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, fs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [kris@obsecurity.org: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc] 
Message-ID:  <200105132342.QAA21879@beastie.mckusick.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 13 May 2001 13:58:42 EDT." <200105131758.f4DHwgl09955@misha.privatelabs.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.privatelabs.com>
> Subject: Re: [kris@obsecurity.org: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc]
> In-Reply-To: <20010512023602.A40616@xor.obsecurity.org> "from Kris Kennaway at
>  May 12, 2001 02:36:02 am"
> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
> Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 13:58:42 -0400 (EDT)
> CC: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
>    cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, fs@FreeBSD.org
> 
> > Working under the assumption that the only time fsck is likely to fail
> > in this manner  is if there are  FS errors which can't  be resolved in
> > the background,  and which  may result  in further  FS damage  if left
> > uncorrected, the  best option seems  to be  to take some  action which
> > prevents this damage.
> >
> > The best series of actions might be the following:
> >
> > 1) Downgrade the FS to readonly mode.
> 
> Can't a  foreground fsck  be run  at this moment?  Having to  reboot for
> anything is rather  ugly... I'm sure there  is a reason it  can not, I'm
> just wondering, what that reason is. Thanks!
> 
> 	-mi

Indeed, a foreground fsck can be run once the downgrade to read-only
has happened. However, doing so automatically is unlikely to be useful
since nearly every error that would get us to this point will also
cause an `fsck -p' to fail. So, at this point a system administrator
is going to have to intervene to do a manual fsck. Once the downgrade
to read-only has happened, no further filesystem damage can occur, so
there is not a great rush to run the manual fsck. However, if the
affected filesystem is something crucial like /var, the system may not
run at all well until the problem is fixed.

	Kirk

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105132342.QAA21879>