Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:26:32 +1000
From:      Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
To:        Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@giovannelli.it>, stable@freebsd.org, esperti@gufi.org
Subject:   Re: strange problem with: ed driver / 4.9-PRE
Message-ID:  <20030916222632.GF91404@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20030916071956.GA25582@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
References:  <6.0.0.22.2.20030916073154.03af28a8@194.184.65.4> <20030916062637.GA25332@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20030916084546.0305c1c0@194.184.65.4> <20030916071956.GA25582@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2003-Sep-16 09:19:56 +0200, Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> wrote:
>(A quick look at the source indicates that there are some other drivers
>that do not meet those assumptions either, so a proper fix should
>include changing ifconfig(8) to make fewer assumptions but such a
>change would require lots of testing to make sure it is correct.)

I've bumped into this with the vlan driver as well.  I believe the fix
is to patch ifconfig(8) so that it checks for "DEVICE" as well as
"if_DEVICE" and skips the load if either is found.  I don't believe
this change is especially risky.

Peter



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030916222632.GF91404>