Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 01:12:20 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr> To: doug@safeport.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvsup question Message-ID: <20011127231220.GB11957@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111271635420.85635-100000@pemaquid.safeport.com> References: <20011127162503.GA8434@hades.hell.gr> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111271635420.85635-100000@pemaquid.safeport.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2001-11-27 17:01:32, doug@safeport.com wrote: > I am probably missing something but as I read your example I do not > think that was my point. Oh pardon me, the timelines were probably a misunderstanding of mine. > There should be no timing issue. In my example > all time are Zulu. > > Using the cvsup date tag format: at 2001.11.25.15 (or later) I ran a > cvsup with no date tag. I observed that the latest mod I picked up was > 2001.11.24.19+. So to get something that (I thought) would be > reproducible I ran another cvsup with a tag of 2001.11.25.00.00.00. > Much earlier than the time of the 2nd cvsup. > > I did not get tags anywhere near the boundary times rather I got: > > Add delta 1.291.2.22 2001.11.02.16.45.05 > Add delta 1.74.2.6 2001.11.23.13.13.19 > Add delta 1.5 99.08.28.01.01.30 > Add delta 1.5.2.2 2001.07.22.12.40.55 > Add delta 1.4 99.08.28.01.16.04 This seems definitely wrong. Especially the deltas from 99.08.28.*. I hope this is not a bug in CVSup that bites you. What version of CVSup are you running. There was an update this autumn, for a bug caused by the 1-billionth second. -giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011127231220.GB11957>