Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:09:32 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/fluxbox Makefile Message-ID: <20040812050932.GC69853@lame.novel.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040811190458.GB96458@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200408091253.i79CrT8k058076@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040811104830.GA709@lame.novel.ru> <opsckwg0d79aq2h7@mezz> <20040811190458.GB96458@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adam wrote: > And FWIW, seeing as how the old fluxbox will never get another update, I > really don't think that x11-wm/fluxbox should be kept in the tree any > longer; I think that x11-wm/fluxbox-devel should overwrite > x11-wm/fluxbox immediately. </can of worms> Agreed. Anyway, if many people want to see fluxbox in the ports tree it could be returned, doesn't it?=20 As for fluxbox-devel -> fluxbox repocopy right now I think that it's a good idea, becouse fluxbox-devel seems to be even more stable than fluxbox= =20 and it's supported by developers.=20 PS I don't really want to start a war simular to the shells/bash* one :-) -Roman Bogorodskiy --MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQRr7jIB0WzgdqspGAQJTsAP7BhNPKbZSGpkntg2HRcaEjmL4OXv/wWZc bw6w8sXkfvvLbM2cvCbbhZsExjVTZapppH35u0+bSmOIyqCTQSj6bIFXNUObum4r qj+94cXP5pR+tAEL3Ok+SzBvQFzQPxGmIeWuu+ZaAf+hYbewCl3NDv4cuiocoHd6 J6pHdL+Twn4= =3ncP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MnLPg7ZWsaic7Fhd--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040812050932.GC69853>