Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 01:02:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193294] [maintainer] graphics/repng2jpeg better conformity upgrade version to ???? Message-ID: <bug-193294-13-mBB8iJKwB4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193294-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193294-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193294 --- Comment #9 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #8) > (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #7) > > Sure. I get it. Given the source is now in my control. Future > > version(s) will use a more FreeBSD friendly naming scheme. :) > > I haven't said anything about the naming scheme. > I am objecting, strongly, to you changing the source without using patches > or a new version. There are 3 outcomes here: > > 1) you revert the distinfo file and provide patches instead > 2) You updating the source to change the version number, re-roll the > tarball, and update the version on the makefile and regenerated the distinfo > 3) you withdraw the PR. > > What you have here is unacceptable. O. OK. Sure. That's understandable. I'll take what's behind door number 2. :) I'll bump, and regenerate as required. New diff to follow shortly. Thanks, and sorry for the bother, John. I'll get this right, yet. Yes. I quite agree. I should have known better, already. :P --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193294-13-mBB8iJKwB4>