Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 09:01:16 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu> Cc: "Andrew A. Chernov" <ache@freefall.cdrom.com>, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-include@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include malloc.h Makefile Message-ID: <199411151701.JAA02575@precipice.Shockwave.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 15 Nov 1994 09:53:38 MST." <199411151653.JAA09195@bsd.coe.montana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why would we want the system5 fatmalloc? Why do we want malloc() at all? Did our name change to FreeUnivel? From: Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include malloc.h Makefile > ache 94/11/15 05:42:21 > > Modified: include Makefile > Added: include malloc.h > Log: > Add malloc.h for better SYSV/Linux compatibility like most > providers (like SUN f.e.) does. > malloc.h have comment about its SYSVism Umm, in your reply to me, you said you were going to fix the ports that require it. If you are just going to add 'malloc.h', why don't you add the libmalloc stuff from 1.1.5?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199411151701.JAA02575>