Date: 24 Feb 2002 17:46:27 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Jeff Palmer" <scorpio@drkshdw.org> Cc: "Ralph Huntington" <rjh@mohawk.net>, <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Couple of concerns with default rc.firewall Message-ID: <xzpd6yuvndo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <001901c1bd4e$3f03d8c0$0286a8c0@home.lan> References: <20020224104008.H14963-100000@mohegan.mohawk.net> <001901c1bd4e$3f03d8c0$0286a8c0@home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jeff Palmer" <scorpio@drkshdw.org> writes: > I'm not sure if you two are bored, or what the problem is. Maybe the problem is your attitude, and your inability and / or unwillingness to express yourself clearly. If the question is "why don't any of the default policies in /etc/rc.firewall include a rule to let icmp packets through?", the answer is (probably) "because nobody cared enough add one". DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpd6yuvndo.fsf>