Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_swap.c 
Message-ID:  <199910110709.AAA20043@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <19991011060638.B3D8D1CCD@overcee.netplex.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> 
:>     We're not removing the device interface.  It provides a reasonable
:>     abstraction and a nice demark between swap_pager.c and vm_swap.c,
:>     as well as potential flexibility that could be useful in the future
:>     Removing it will not save time or much in the way of code space.
:
:The swap *device* is non-functional and doesn't *do* anything except
:provide a subroutine call in a very roundabout way.  I think it would be
:far better to avoid an indirection via the VOP_* system for no useful gain
:and do something like the aooended patch (which works perfectly here BTW,
:even under heavy swap load on multiple disks).  Further (micro)
:optimizations are possible, for example pbgetvp() is used to get a p-buffer
:that's associated with swapdev_vp and the device.  The device isn't used
:and presently vn_todev(vp) ends up returning NODEV.  swapdev_vp is kinda
:orphaned with this change but still works ok. p-buffers are created being

    Gentlemen.  You might as well stop.  I've said it before and I
    will say it again:  Nobody is screwing around with the swap 
    subsytem.  I spent a lot of time on that subsytem, including weeks
    of testing.  I am essentially the maintainer for it, and I am not 
    going to allow people to mess with it based on a few hacks.  Just
    because the swap subsystem uses a small subset of the device 
    interface doesn't mean you can hack it up to remove it.  You are not
    'fixing' anything by doing so.  You aren't making the system more reliable,
    you aren't making the system run better.  You are just making my job
    harder by forcing me to retest everything.  So it isn't going to happen.

						-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910110709.AAA20043>