Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:11:46 +0200
From:      Chris Knipe <savage@savage.za.org>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        FreeBSD - <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Mailing List Etiquette was freebsd vs. netbsd
Message-ID:  <CA+4TWFtgaMkJWAOuvEpSg2TOo2hrG-P7EHJUigCQwgQw3iXtWQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200616140416.bd7b8bf2.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <20200613154409.GA89618@neutralgood.org> <13115.1592302784@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <20200616071153.00006f4d@seibercom.net> <CA+4TWFuWN1BV=FftC1xNCYRgqwX+Cb=wMg_L9MxFHx17Nzjm5Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200616075548.000066f1@seibercom.net> <20200616140416.bd7b8bf2.freebsd@edvax.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
>
>
> While this is true in general, one should always keep in
> mind not to confuse change with improvement: "newer" does
> not magically imply "better", so educated human judgement
> is always welcome.
>

That is your opinion, and you're entitled to it.  Frankly, I am -very-
happy we have moved past 76 character width limitations, and text based
emails with crappy fonts.

Yes, there is risk involved, sure.  There are risks involved in -anything-
you do online these days... Again, there's means to protect against it.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA+4TWFtgaMkJWAOuvEpSg2TOo2hrG-P7EHJUigCQwgQw3iXtWQ>