Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:16:43 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Janos Dohanics <web@3dresearch.com> Subject: Re: Advice on net/asterisk Message-ID: <CAHu1Y72tChSMy_i9B=Hph2dD6xMADvd0bbRi9Hn0tp1a-%2BioNA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK10NdynxtXo9%2By0fjuW4ccYCYDTtWyjJAFSuAJKb99KAA@mail.gmail.com> References: <20150303100752.bc81306b8346ca640247e2e6@3dresearch.com> <CA%2BtpaK3MWimphraLDV5iR6_ovFdx1FwbQfuXeYGbiodrmR4JAQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150303135513.dfd90edc61738291d1e2fa53@3dresearch.com> <CA%2BtpaK10NdynxtXo9%2By0fjuW4ccYCYDTtWyjJAFSuAJKb99KAA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote: > > Depends on your use case. If phone is mission critical to the business and > required to be highest quality all the time, then PRI is pretty much going > to be required. > > With SIP, it's generally much cheaper trunking, scaling, and provider > switching, but you're much more susceptible to network issues. So if you > don't have a good full QoS/CoS setup and aren't going to implement one, > along with have rock solid and maybe dual homed pipes then SIP might not be > a good choice. > > Too true. Apply all the QoS you want, use a separate VLAN for VoIP, but all that effort ceases to be of any use once packets reach your DMARC.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y72tChSMy_i9B=Hph2dD6xMADvd0bbRi9Hn0tp1a-%2BioNA>