Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:56:26 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c ip_fw.h src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw.c Message-ID: <20010219235626.E8851@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200102152123.NAA82143@curve.dellroad.org>; from archie@dellroad.org on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:23:56PM -0800 References: <200102131601.LAA30728@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <200102152123.NAA82143@curve.dellroad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:23:56PM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote: >=20 > Here's a proposal :-) >=20 > Netgraphify the entire networking stack. Each interface is a node, > the local IP stack (or stacks) is a node, etc. Sprinkle liberally > with ng_ipfw(4) (or better yet, ng_bpf(4), allowing full tcpdump > style packet matching) nodes to suit. How much work is this? What does it buy us performance-wise? Joe --zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjqRsqkACgkQXVIcjOaxUBYPbwCfbr0dSSm8L5GCRx90Apm5JjUt mPUAoIUB51OF+UBGkTb1hnRdx2rEvcjc =U4NA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010219235626.E8851>