Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 23:12:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, davidg@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.960815231003.14489A-100000@gilligan.eng.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <26519.840164321@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Aug 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > The one reason I can think of for shutting down sup access to -stable > > would be if you want to free up all the disk space that's currently > > needed for the checked-out copy on the server. > > That would be nice, yes. Perhaps then we should simply say "CTM only" > since CTM is a good way of distributing bits which don't change > frequently. Am I confused? If you would distribute it via CTM, then you'd still need that checked out copy of -stable, for CTM to diff against, right? Of course, it would mean less ftp and machine time load ... Jordan, I see your port of rsync builds fine, are you going to commit it? Do you have any plans to test it? Would you mind if I did? > > Jordan > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.95.960815231003.14489A-100000>