Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 15:13:44 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ImageMagick bump Message-ID: <1178392424.55607.16.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20070505190714.GC21388@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070505170012.GA62735@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178389743.55607.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505183147.GA20810@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178389962.55607.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505185138.GA21388@xor.obsecurity.org> <1178391323.55607.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20070505190103.GB21388@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070505190714.GC21388@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-NFt4jr+d56+ACT64pptY Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 15:07 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:01:03PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:55:23PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:51 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:32:42PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:31 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:29:03PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wro= te: > > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:00 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > > It looks like ImageMagick depends on fontconfig but didnt g= et bumped, > > > > > > > > can you confirm? > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Also I wonder about ports that have optional dependencies o= n > > > > > > > > fontconfig, we should probably bump them too to be safe (ot= herwise > > > > > > > > people will have stale references to /usr/X11R6 in .la file= s again) > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > Actually, ImageMagick should have been bumped, but was not. = There are > > > > > > > only two ports by my count that have fontconfig as an optiona= l disabled > > > > > > > dependency. I will recheck my script to see why some ports w= ere not > > > > > > > bumped. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > >=20 > > > > > I found the problem. My script didn't take DISTVERSION into acco= unt. I > > > > > will send out a new, complete tarball shortly. > > > >=20 > > > > Maybe a diff against previous bumpage would be better, if > > > > possible...flz? > > >=20 > > > That would be very hard to generate at this point. I mean, it would = be > > > trivial if I was allowed to re-bump the ports that had already been > > > bumped. Otherwise I'd have to manually fiddle with my list. > >=20 > > OK, I guess flz will just have to cope :) >=20 > Actually you could create a diff by producing two trees: one with your > previous patch applied and one with your rerun of the bump script. Or > flz could. Yeah, I'm working on producing both a complete diff and an incremental diff. Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-NFt4jr+d56+ACT64pptY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGPNdmb2iPiv4Uz4cRAoRFAJ95FY6AKzHZ/TnZM9ZFPZT2pIDzsgCgiXY5 DnlFW4ysjimWwKEMQmzHKDc= =wLvx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NFt4jr+d56+ACT64pptY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1178392424.55607.16.camel>