Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:01:16 -0800 (PST) From: Yu-Shun Wang <yushunwa@isi.edu> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Strong vs. Weak ES models? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103140956490.3040-100000@amc.isi.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010314135930.D74704@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, The current FreeBSD (or all BSD IP stacks) implements Weak End System model as described in RFC 1122. And as Jonathan pointed out, there is a switch similar to but not completely does the Strong ES model called net.inet.ip.check_interface, but it's in either -stable or -current. Probably will be included in FreeBSD 4.3. regards, yushun. On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > Hi Yu-Shun, > > -On [20010308 22:05], Yu-Shun Wang (yushunwa@isi.edu) wrote: > > Has the topic of Strong/Weak ES model been discussed here? > > Please give me a pointer if the topic has been debated. > > In what sense discussed? What type we are? What we support? > > > I was wondering if there's a sysctl switch (like > > net.inet.ip.strongendsystem mentioned in NetBSD list) > > implemented in FreeBSD. > > Not as far as I know. > > -- > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai .oUo. asmodai@[wxs.nl|freebsd.org] > Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best > D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 > Religion... Is the opium of the people... > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0103140956490.3040-100000>