Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:39:28 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To:        Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: aio patch for review.
Message-ID:  <20041001043928.GN39252@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041001041919.GC16408@cs.rice.edu>
References:  <20040930091814.GG39252@elvis.mu.org> <20041001041919.GC16408@cs.rice.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu> [040930 21:19] wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:18:14AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > properly cover the socket buffer for operations that need locking.
> > 
> 
> Just to be clear, your point is that soreadable() and sowriteable()
> should be performed with the corresponding socket buffer locked.
> Correct?  If so, yes, please go ahead and commit it.

Yup.

thank you,
-- 
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041001043928.GN39252>