Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 22:56:18 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles Message-ID: <1154984178.95608.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <50488990@bsam.ru> References: <14817321@bsam.ru> <20060807183724.GA47899@xor.obsecurity.org> <16560673@bsam.ru> <20060807201203.GA84762@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <50488990@bsam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-8yf189qzTBW3gfIa/CO7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Boris Samorodov p=ED=B9e v =FAt 08. 08. 2006 v 00:24 +0400:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:03 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:56:46PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:37:25 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:12:06AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > > We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz
> > > > > distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not =
at
> > > > > 4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may be done for example, by using
> > > > > USE_BZIP2 knob and doing gunzipping at after-extract:.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Does someone know a better solution?
> > > > > Does we have examples at our ports?
> > >=20
> > > > Use a do-extract that extracts all distfiles or EXTRACT_ONLY with
> > > > post-extract that extracts the other ones.
> > >=20
> > > Thanks, Kris. I'm trying to test (actually, to find an 4.x system)
> > > some broken ports with a patch(es) which includes (thanks Brooks):
> > > -----
> > > .if ${OSVERSION} < 500000
> > > EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=3D bsdtar:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/libarchive
> > > TAR=3D /usr/local/bin/bsdtar
> > > .endif
> > > -----
> > >=20
> > > To me that seems a good solution.
>=20
> > I'd suggest using not using an absolute path in the TAR definition
> > since the dependency check doesn't and using 502111 as the version sinc=
e
> > that's the first version bump after the initial bsdtar import. Not tha=
t
> > we really need to worry about such early 5.x release, but it's more
> > correct.
>=20
> Thanks again, Brooks. The patch will include (if Kris won't complain):
> -----
> .if ${OSVERSION} < 502111
> EXTRACT_DEPENDS+=3D bsdtar:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/libarchive
> TAR=3D bsdtar
> .endif
> -----
Would writing own do-extract: target be better alternative?
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Shop at the Mobius Strip Mall: Always on the same side of the street!
--=-8yf189qzTBW3gfIa/CO7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBE16jyntdYP8FOsoIRAjRTAJ9fP0pF9KOpQGPbJwSW6PjjIEFZHwCfQDU3
zK9IZ4xsl9UYVza0xq4iuTY=
=usL9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-8yf189qzTBW3gfIa/CO7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1154984178.95608.6.camel>