Date: Wed, 06 Sep 1995 13:22:14 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com> Cc: Bill Trost <trost@cloud.rain.com>, Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we *really* need logger(1)? Message-ID: <199509062022.NAA26565@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 06 Sep 95 12:56:23 PDT." <Pine.BSF.3.91.950906125555.7950A-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>On Wed, 6 Sep 1995, Bill Trost wrote: > >> Internet, so syslogd(8) can also be used as a remote disk-filling >> service. (And, since it's UDP-based, you can't tcp-wrap it...). > > tcp_wrapper is primitive. xinetd is better and can support UDP. Um, syslogd is a daemon and is not spawned by inetd...so how would doing anything with inetd affect this problem? -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509062022.NAA26565>