Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:58:11 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> To: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@freebsd.org> Cc: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org>, ports@freebsd.org, Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: category for VPN softwares? Message-ID: <20190403005811.43yjdtuqso2sbrk4@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <CAD9iB3eRj_Sm=oxEFNkqrM-%2BQVXXNza-kLXAXTNmg%2BQLOvp=ng@mail.gmail.com> References: <20190402032434.i5tvmzjrti6bz44s@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190402044151.GG72200@home.opsec.eu> <20190402054219.pbibp2jxqhtwqkru@icepick.vmeta.jp> <954df870-50bb-c7c0-f559-94dd92fce3a6@freebsd.org> <CAD9iB3eRj_Sm=oxEFNkqrM-%2BQVXXNza-kLXAXTNmg%2BQLOvp=ng@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:38:15AM +0200, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: > I am not sure if it should be vpn or net-vpn. I feel net-vpn is > more suitable. As you know, we already have net-im, net-p2p, net-mgmt categories. This is one of reasons why I feel net-vpn is more suitable. -- meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190403005811.43yjdtuqso2sbrk4>