Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:50:04 GMT From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/124122: [PATCH] security/barnyard: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] Message-ID: <200805311350.m4VDo4rk006623@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/124122; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: Akiko Narita <shuyaan@gmail.com>, bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/124122: [PATCH] security/barnyard: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:43:27 -0500 --On May 31, 2008 9:35:31 PM +0900 Akiko Narita <shuyaan@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't know what the desire is for the submission of this patch, but >> barnyard won't even run without the correct flags, so the patch doesn't >> make any sense to me. > > Hello Paul, > > Sorry, I forgot to describe the problem I'm trying to solve. > > I've used barnyard-sguil-0.2.0_4. > When I started up barnyard-sguil, barnyard loaded 'barnyard_flags' > redundantly(/usr/local/etc/rc.d/barnyard and /etc/rc.conf) and it > couldn't start up. > I think that you don't need to specify 'barnyard_flags' in > rc.d/barnyard. '*_flags' is usually set in /etc/rc.conf, isn't it? > Barnyard_flags must be defined in the startup script or its values in rc.conf will be ignored. However, I may have made a mistake in the startup file that is causing the inclusion of both. I'll investigate. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200805311350.m4VDo4rk006623>